Home › Final paycheck letters › California › pto
Accrued, unused vacation is wages and must be paid at separation (Cal. Lab. Code § 227.3). Use-it-or-lose-it forfeiture without a vested cap is not enforceable.
The practical question is not whether your employer has a policy — most do — but whether that policy actually forfeits earned time, and whether it was communicated before you earned it.
A demand letter fixes three things at once: the amount, the date each item was due, and the date the employer was on notice. Every forum that can help you — the California Labor Commissioner's Office (DIR), a small claims judge — starts from those three facts. The letter is built from Cal. Lab. Code §§ 201, 202, 203; § 227.3 (vacation); § 200 (wages) and your own figures, so the deadline it states is the one that applies to your separation, not a generic thirty days.
If the amount fits inside $12,500, small claims court is usually faster than an agency queue; if it does not, the agency route and a demand first is the cheaper path.
Accrued, unused vacation is wages and must be paid at separation (Cal. Lab. Code § 227.3). Use-it-or-lose-it forfeiture without a vested cap is not enforceable.
A forfeiture has to come from a policy that applied while the time was being earned. A policy introduced at separation, or applied only to departing employees, is the weakest version of the argument and is worth challenging in writing.
being fired · resigning · a layoff · unpaid commissions · all California rules
Reviewed 2026-11-03 against the sources listed on the California page. This is a self-help document tool, not legal advice, and no outcome is guaranteed.